A new twist in the Trump–Epstein saga is catching fire. The Wall Street Journal has revealed that a 2003 birthday album for Jeffrey Epstein included a note signed “Donald” under a sketch of a naked woman. The message read: “Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.” The signature was placed as if it were pubic hair on the drawing.
This news blew up fast. Earlier reports say Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s close associate, gathered personal messages from powerful people in that album. Alongside the note, there was a typewritten back‑and‑forth styled as dialogue between Epstein and Trump. Neither Reuters nor other outlets could confirm its authenticity.
Trump roared back. On Truth Social he called the story fake and threatened lawsuits against the Wall Street Journal, News Corp, and Rupert Murdoch. He said, “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women. It’s not my language. It’s not my words.” Vice President JD Vance and right‑wing activists also slammed the report as pure “BS”.
This revelation comes as Trump ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek public release of sealed grand jury testimony tied to Epstein’s case. Bondi quickly responded, promising to comply—although court approval is needed.
The controversy has rattled the MAGA base. Some loyalists burned their MAGA hats in protest, while others demanded transparency around Epstein’s files. House Republicans felt the heat—debates over public spending and Epstein documents delayed votes on a key bill .
What does this really mean? If genuine, the letter adds fuel to growing concerns about Trump’s relationship with Epstein—just as the Justice Department wrapped up its review, finding no “client list” or evidence of blackmail. Trump insists he cut ties long ago, but images and logs from the 1990s show he was part of Epstein’s social circle .
For Trend Rage, the lesson is clear: Truth matters, especially when powerful people face fresh questions. The real story isn’t just about a sketch—it’s about transparency, accountability, and how much we really know.
0 Comments